Topic: Self-cest + Dickneck CTF
So I have this idea of combining this kind of dickneck CTF ( http://gammatelier.free.fr/full/joy_dickneck.jpg) with self-cest, but I have a ton of ideas with variations and I'm having trouble coming up with a finalized form. Help me out here.
My current "prototype" involves the underside of a horse (or centaur), with the girl's head at the end of a thick horsecock. When fully erect, she faces forward (+ a little bit down due to the shape of the horse barrel). The TF is still one-person, one-body, so the girl still controls the entire body even though her head placement is obviously not ideal.
Also on the underside of the horse, at about the midway point, there is a hanging pussy-tunnel. If she grows too aroused, she will end up fucking herself to the point where she can't help but gyrate her horse hips and thrust her own dick (and face) in and out of her own tunnel, finishing with cumming out of her mouth and into her own love-tunnel.
1. In regards to her dickneck, there are two options:
A. At rest, her dickneck is completely flaccid, and her head is the only thing poking out of the sheath (accompanied by a huge sack of horse testes). As she grows aroused, her head first faces toward the ground, but rises as it further erects.
B. Her dickneck is permanently erect, so that she can always see (almost) forward. But getting more aroused causes her dickneck to lengthen and expand drastically. This way she will always have a view of her own tunnel (which I like), but it also makes less physical sense (which I don't like). It also means that her head won't be the only thing poking of her sheath, which loses out on cute factor (and anticipation factor, since it means less starting distance between her face and her pussy-tunnel).
Which one do you prefer?
As you can probably tell, I'm a huge fan of option B, since the whole point of me coming up with this is the slowly growing anticipation of having your aroused dick push your own face forward inch by inch toward your own love-tunnel (followed by abusing your own face as you can't help but literally fuck yourself). But option B also means that there is less starting distance and thus less anticipation. Plus, having an already erect cock lengthen forward and backward doesn't make physical sense, and comes off as rather silly. If possible, I could use some ideas in ironing out the flaws with option B.
Alternatively, is there another form you can suggest (ditching the horse base-form entirely)? Having a hanging pussy-tunnel simply attached to the bottomside of a horse body has little aesthetic, if any.
2. Speaking of the pussy-tunnel:
A. Should the pussy-tunnel be open-ended (with labia at both ends)? Should the girl be able to fuck her face through the tunnel and come out the other side? (yes, I realize how funny this sounds)
B. Or should the pussy-tunnel remain one-way? Should she only be able to see again once she cums and loses arousal?
Option A admittedly is just fucking amazing with no words to describe the bizarre-ness, especially if you can imagine yourself plunging in and out through to the other side. Plus, everyone would be able to see you cum out of your face. But I think option B would just feel better because you'd have a deeper pussy to work with. It would be the difference between a short and a full-sized onahole. Which would you choose?